Elegant shoes from Aubercy, but well-fitting shoes too?
There is a bias towards shoe shape, when I browse the web. People adore the beautiful line of an Italian or a French shoe. The discussion about shoe fit is there too, yet marginalized.
In a world of ready-to-wear I guess it must be so. Since very few buy bespoke shoes, which excel in fit (and make) usually, the field of focus become supreme shoe shape. Everybody can relate to that. Moreover, shoe shape is much more visible than shoe fit.
A discussion with a very experienced bespoke customer made me think about the proper shoe fit and proper shoe shape debate again.
“French shoes don’t fit”, he said directly.
I suppose some do. But I understand his priority. Super shoes begin with a super fit. In principle the rest is just styling. Clearly, well-fitting shoes with no elegant lines are useless for the man-about-town. However, true style includes functionality that only you will notice, for instance an excellent shoe fit. Style needs depth.
To bring on Nietzsche:
“Those Greeks were superficial – out of profundity.”
Moreover, if shoes don’t fit less elegant leather folds can appear over time. The once beautiful shoe shape can collapse.
Duel between bespoke shoes
Let’s look at an example of proper shoe fit and proper shoe shape within the category of bespoke shoes …
500 Euros versus 2.500 Euros. Tadeusz Januszkiewicz on the left versus Benjamin Klemann on the right. Perhaps not a large difference at first. When you look again, you will notice more clean and elegant lines on the shoes from Klemann and better leather. I’m sure the make of Klemann’s shoes also outmatches the make of the Januszkiewicz shoes. In terms of fit the Januszkiewicz shoes fit quiet well, though not to the same extent as the Klemann shoes. If those differences are big enough to travel to Hamburg instead of going Warsaw, is a personal choice.
Photography: Sartorial Notes